Offline ETQA Administrator

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
« on: July 24, 2015, 08:37:38 AM »
Read more on their website:

The purpose of evaluating and approving learning programmes is to ensure that the programme meets the criteria and the learning programme outcomes bear a close relationship to unit standards and qualifications as per the spirit of outcomes based education adopted by the SAQA.

This program registration applies to:
•   Providers who are already accredited by the AgriSETA and are now applying to extend their scope to cover new programmes.
•   Providers who belong to another SETA, but a programme that they run falls under the AgriSETA scope.
•   NB’ Providers should only complete these forms if the programme they run is aligned with unit standards.

•   Please do not send the guidelines back to us. We only need the completed forms and the additional submissions.
•   Use the criterion stipulated by this guidelines to prepare your program evaluation to make sure that your program is complete.
•   If not accredited with AgriSETA make sure that your accreditation number and SETA ETQA of your primary focus is mentioned in the form.


The purpose of this criterion is to evaluate the extend to which the programme outcomes are in line with the Unit Standards.

The criteria are as follows:
•   The scope of your programme is comparable with the scope of the Unit
           Standard. i.e.The purpose of the programme is in line with the purpose of   the UnitStandards,  The programme is appropriate for the level of the target group.
•   The outcomes are clearly written and measurable.
•   Critical cross-field outcomes are developed in your programme.
•   Entry level requirements are fair.
•   Are there any additional innovations or special features that contribute to
            achieving the criteria?


The purpose of this criterion is to evaluate the extent to which your programme content, the training methods  and the learning materials used are outcomes based, and in line with the Unit Standards.

The criteria are as follows:

•   The content covered, and the skills developed are appropriate to achieving the outcomes.
•   There is a clear link between the activities of the programme and
           outcome statements.
•   Your programme is outcomes-based. For example: Skills are practised and applied in a way that simulates reality; Learners seek information actively; Concepts are developed by the learners through participating; the focus is not only on what is learned but how it is learned, etc.
•   The design is logical and cumulative (sections, knowledge and skills build on from each other)

Training Methods:

•   Learners participate actively in their own learning.
•   Where appropriate, a variety of training methods, experiences, exercises, activities are used (e.g. role plays, individual and pair work, group work, case studies, games, pen and paper exercises)
•   Outcomes-based learning principles are applied: e.g. the experiential learning on the experience, applying what is learned through active experimentation; learning relates directly to real life experience.

Learning Materials:

•   The language and tone are appropriate, i.e.  clear and direct,  non-patronising,  non-racist and non-sexist,  technical jargon is explained and  avoid stereotyping, Visuals and layout are appealing and appropriate
           The format of training materials is appropriate for its purpose.

•   Are there any additional or innovative uses made of content, methods or
           learning materials?


The purpose of this criterion is to evaluate the extent to which the assessment
Practices (or methods) are in line with NQF requirements.

The criteria are as follows:
•   The full range of unit standards or exit level outcomes are assessed and relevant assessment criteria are applied.
•   The assessment practices are valid. That is, the assessment measures what it says it is measuring.
•   Types of assessment instruments used (interview, written test etc.) are
•   The subject matter assessed relates to the relevant unit standards.
•   Skills assessed relate to the relevant unit standards.
•   The assessment practices are fair. That is, individual learners are not hindered or advantaged by factors not relevant to the outcomes being assessed.
•   Assessments are not biased in terms of ethnicity, gender, age, context etc.
•   Language used in assessment procedures is appropriate to the level of the learners.
•   Assessment results will not be affected by unequal resources/conditions
            during assessments.
•   Learners are adequately prepared for being assessed.
•   Learners are given adequate support during longer-term assessment tasks like portfolios.
•   Formative (ongoing) assessment is used continuously to enhance the quality of teaching and learning.
•   Learners are given constructive feedback on assessment results.
•   Learners have the right to appeal.
•   The assessment practices are reliable. That is, there is consistency in the
assessment system and the same judgements would be made by   different assessors or in different contexts.
•   Assessment results are moderated.
•   Assessments are properly administered.
•   Appropriate logistic arrangements are made (venue, equipment etc.)
•   Recording procedures are adequate and accurate.
•   Adequate security arrangements are made to avoid irregularities.

The purpose of these criteria is to evaluate the extent to which facilitators, assessors and moderators are equipped, experienced and qualified to run, assess and moderate these programmes. This criterion also aims to find out what plans are in place to further develop staff to meet requirements, where this is necessary.

The criteria we are looking for are as follows:
•   Practitioners are equipped, experienced and qualified to facilitate your
programme, offer learner support and manage quality control.
•   Practitioners have relevant subject expertise.
•   Staff members are competent to undertake management and administration tasks.
•   Assessors are competent and qualified to assess your programme.
•   Moderators are in place to moderate assessment (assessment and moderation of a programme needs to be done by different people)
•   (It is acceptable for your programme to be assessed and moderated by external providers – indicate where this is the case.)
•   Plans are in place to further develop practitioners, where required.


The purpose of this criterion is to evaluate the extent to which the training provider provides support to the learners before, during and after training.

The criteria are as follows:

•   Support is offered to learners before the programme (e.g. criteria for selecting and placing learners in the programme are available; bridging programmes; orientation programmes, guidance; counseling)
•   Support is offered to learners during the programme (e.g. individual coaching; mentoring; catering for special needs; remedial attention; additional academic support)
•   Support is offered to learners after the programme (e.g. follow-up; mentoring; placement assistance; details about further education and training opportunities; details about certification of the programme).
Education Training Questions and Answers Forum

Division of


SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk