Author Topic: Criteria for the approval of an Assessment Quality Partner  (Read 48 times)

Offline ETQA Administrator

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Criteria for the approval of an Assessment Quality Partner
« on: December 08, 2017, 06:56:57 PM »
The QCTO will appoint an entity as an assessment quality partner only if it is satisfied that the entity has:

i.   The necessary expertise, experience and standing in relation to the occupational qualifications or foundational learning for which the assessment quality partner is appointed; and
ii.   the resources necessary to perform its functions

In terms of clause of the QCTO Delegation Policy, 22 June 2011 the criteria have been defined in detail as follows:

i.   be  recommended  to  the  QCTO  by  the  relevant   DQP  during  the occupational   development  process at a point  when they submit  an
occupational profile. Possible evidence: letter of recommendation from the DQP; Attendance register; DQP progress report with endorsement of the selected body by constituency to ensure trust and acceptance; extracts from minutes of scoping meeting where the decision took place;
ii.      have access to communities of expert practitioners in the occupation/s concerned;    Possible evidence: Attendance registers; reference to extracts from websites with links to CEPs or any other relevant information such as an indication as to where the AQP will source expertise to design assessments;
iii.   have standing in the occupation or occupations concerned; Possible evidence: cross reference to websites, publications and any other relevant information;
iv.   have access to assessors and other human resources necessary to perform the AQP functions using criteria and guidelines provided by the QCTO. Possible evidence: Database of assessors
v.   have access to a reliable management information system in the format required by the   QCTO; Possible evidence: Organogram or reference to an organisation to whom this function has been outsourced;
vi.   have the financial resources necessary to establish the AQP function and implement effective, efficient and transparent financial management and internal control systems, verified by means of a written commitment by its relevant authority; Possible evidence: evidence that the functions have been catered for in the organisation budget; a letter from the AQPs relevant authority committing the necessary financial resources to fund the AQP;
vii.    have a proposed fee structure funding model to maintain the delivery of AQP services for    a minimum of five years aligned to the QCTO Fee Structure Policy;
viii.    be willing to sign the QCTO Code of Conduct (Schedule 4) if delegation is approved;
ix.   have  research  capacity  even  if  through  a  third  party  arrangement;
Possible evidence:   cross reference to reports or process of how this criterion will be addressed; and
x.   Proof  that  the  organisation  is  a  juristic  person:  Possible  evidence:
submit a valid tax clearance certificate where appropriate.

Proof must be submitted to demonstrate adherence with the criteria mentioned above.

Education Training Questions and Answers Forum

Division of


Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 


MONTHLY: Training Courses Weekly: Educational Updates Facebook page Training Providers Hire Me JOBS / Tenders


SAQA Qualifications Search SETA's